RESUMEN
Infectious disease spreading is a spatial interaction process. Assessing community vulnerability to infectious diseases thus requires not only information on local demographic and built environmental conditions, but also insights into human activity interactions with neighboring areas that can lead to the transition of vulnerability from locations to locations. This study presented an analytical framework based on the Particle Swarm Optimization model to estimate the weights of the factors for vulnerability modeling, and a local proportional parameter for use in the integration of the local and neighboring area risks. A country model and five cross-region validation models were developed for the case study of Singapore to assess the vulnerability to COVID-19. The results showed that the identified weights for the factors were robust throughout the optimization process and across various models. The local proportional parameter could be set slightly higher in between 0.6 and 0.8 (out of 1), signifying that the local effect was higher than the neighboring effect. Computation of the weights from the optimal solutions for the integrated vulnerability index showed that the factors of human activity intensity and accessibility to amenities had much higher weights, at 0.5 and 0.3, respectively. Conversely, the weights of population density, elderly population, social economic status and land use diversity were much lower. These findings underscored the importance of considering non-equal weights for factors and incorporating spatial interactions between local and neighboring areas for vulnerability modeling, to provide to a more comprehensive assessment of vulnerability to infectious diseases.
RESUMEN
COVID-19 has struck the world with multiple waves. Each wave was caused by a variant and presented different peaks and baselines. This made the identification of waves with the time series of the cases a difficult task. Human activity intensities may affect the occurrence of an outbreak. We demonstrated a metric of time series, namely log-moving-average-ratio (LMAR), to identify the waves and directions of the changes in the disease cases and check-ins (MySejahtera). Based on the detected waves and changes, we explore the relationship between the two. Using the stimulus-organism-response model with our results, we presented a four-stage model: (1) government-imposed movement restrictions, (2) revenge travel, (3) self-imposed movement reduction, and (4) the new normal. The inverse patterns between check-ins and pandemic waves suggested that the self-imposed movement reduction would naturally happen and would be sufficient for a smaller epidemic wave. People may spontaneously be aware of the severity of epidemic situations and take appropriate disease prevention measures to reduce the risks of exposure and infection. In summary, LMAR is more sensitive to the waves and could be adopted to characterize the association between travel willingness and confirmed disease cases.
RESUMEN
As lockdowns and stay-at-home orders start to be lifted across the globe, governments are struggling to establish effective and practical guidelines to reopen their economies. In dense urban environments with people returning to work and public transportation resuming full capacity, enforcing strict social distancing measures will be extremely challenging, if not practically impossible. Governments are thus paying close attention to particular locations that may become the next cluster of disease spreading. Indeed, certain places, like some people, can be "super-spreaders". Is a bustling train station in a central business district more or less susceptible and vulnerable as compared to teeming bus interchanges in the suburbs? Here, we propose a quantitative and systematic framework to identify spatial super-spreaders and the novel concept of super-susceptibles, i.e. respectively, places most likely to contribute to disease spread or to people contracting it. Our proposed data-analytic framework is based on the daily-aggregated ridership data of public transport in Singapore. By constructing the directed and weighted human movement networks and integrating human flow intensity with two neighborhood diversity metrics, we are able to pinpoint super-spreader and super-susceptible locations. Our results reveal that most super-spreaders are also super-susceptibles and that counterintuitively, busy peripheral bus interchanges are riskier places than crowded central train stations. Our analysis is based on data from Singapore, but can be readily adapted and extended for any other major urban center. It therefore serves as a useful framework for devising targeted and cost-effective preventive measures for urban planning and epidemiological preparedness.